|
Dean Witter Reynolds - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dean Witter Reynolds was an American stock brokerage catering to the middle class. In 1997, it merged with the Morgan Stanley Group to form Morgan Stanley Dean Witter. The amalgamated firm is now know...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Witter_Reynolds |
||
|
Global financial services firm and a market leader in securities, asset management and credit services. The alliance will provide both MUFG and Morgan Stanley with a valuable strategic partner as they seek to enhance their global footprints and capture financial services opportunities around the world.
|
||
|
Formed 1978 by the merger of Dean Witter with Reynolds & Co. Dean Witter Reynolds was acquired by Sears Roebuck in 1981 and maintained its identity there. Former Dean Witter Reynolds VP...
|
||
|
As a result, VALIC generated two checks. The first ("Check I") was cut on September 29, 1998, for the amount of $211,041.66. The second ("Check II") was cut on September 30, 1998, for $126,947.59. Both checks were made payable to "Morgan Stanley Dean Witter FBO: Merle B. Bass" and contained Mrs. Bass's social security number.
|
||
|
<b>Summary:</b> According to a press release dated July 30, 2007, an appeals court has marked the fifth anniversary of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by dismissing a securities fraud case against brokers Dean Witter Reynolds Inc., ruling the class action could not be revived even by today COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
|
||
03-12545 ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 02-02115-CV-T-26-EAJ MARK TELLO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., n.k.a. Morgan Stanley DW Inc., PAUL GRANDE, Defendants-Appellants, MARK RODGERS, Defendant.
|
||
|
Dedicated to giving individual investors the finest thinking, products and services in the financial world. At Morgan Stanley, we believe it is our responsibility not only to help you achieve your investment goals, but also to protect your assets.
|
||
2 HOWSAM v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC. Syllabus tions Workers, 475 U. S. 643, 649. The phrase “question of arbitra-bility” has a limited scope, applicable in the kind of narrow circum-stance where contracting parties would likely have expected a court to have decided the gateway matter.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Plaintiff-Appellant Dean Witter Reynolds, Karen Howsam ("Howsam") was a customer of Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. ("Dean Witter") in March and April 1986, at which time she was advised by Dean Witter, through two of its brokers, Robert P. Howard and Paul J. Siler, to invest in a total of four limited partnerships.
|
